Menu
In a world increasingly driven by environmental consciousness, few things offer a greater sense of satisfaction than making a purchase that promises to benefit the planet. Whether it’s a product labeled “organic,” “eco-friendly,” or a vacation stay in an “ecotourism” lodge, these choices are marketed as contributions to a healthier Earth. Yet, the allure of these green labels often masks a more complex and troubling reality.
Costa Rica, often lauded as a beacon of sustainability and eco-tourism, faces significant challenges behind its green facade. The country’s booming real estate market, promoted as environmentally friendly, frequently practices greenwashing—where developers falsely advertise their projects as eco-conscious while engaging in environmentally harmful practices. Meanwhile, the country’s commitment to renewable energy is complicated by the extensive use of hydroelectric dams, which, despite their green credentials, carry profound environmental costs.
Further complicating the picture is the extensive use of pesticides in Costa Rica’s agriculture sector, particularly in banana plantations, which poses severe risks to both human health and the environment. The heavy use of these chemicals not only contaminates local water supplies but also impacts the delicate ecosystems of neotropical rivers.
In this article, we will unravel these issues, exposing the greenwashing prevalent in Costa Rica’s real estate and tourism sectors, the environmental and social costs of hydroelectric power, and the devastating impact of pesticide use. By understanding the true costs behind these green labels, we can better advocate for genuine sustainability and accountability in both environmental practices and business claims.
Costa Rica’s real estate market, particularly in rapidly developing regions like Costa Ballena, has experienced a surge in new projects. While some developers genuinely implement environmentally-friendly practices, others misuse the eco-friendly label to attract buyers without making substantive changes. This discrepancy raises concerns about the integrity of green marketing in real estate. Key issues include:
Illegal Land-Clearing Practices: Some developers engage in illegal slash-and-burn agriculture to clear land for high-density developments. These practices are often hidden from regulatory authorities, resulting in significant environmental damage. The cleared land suffers from soil erosion and increased sedimentation in nearby rivers, disrupting aquatic ecosystems.
Destruction of Ecosystems: The resulting sedimentation from these practices often impacts critical ecosystems, including mangroves, coral reefs, and other marine environments. The destruction of these habitats undermines biodiversity and compromises the health of local waterways.
Intimidation of Whistleblowers: Individuals who expose illegal environmental practices often face threats and intimidation, including legal actions and physical violence. This suppression of dissent inhibits effective regulatory oversight and diminishes public accountability.
To address the issue of greenwashing, consumers must adopt a critical and informed approach. Authentic eco-friendly businesses provide specific, concrete evidence of their environmental contributions. Key strategies for verification include:
Costa Rica’s extensive use of pesticides, particularly in the banana industry, poses significant environmental and health risks. Key data points include:
Neotropical rivers in Costa Rica are essential ecosystems that face severe threats from agricultural practices, particularly due to the extensive use of pesticides. These rivers support a rich diversity of aquatic life and provide vital resources for local communities. However, the misuse of pesticides in agriculture has led to significant issues:
Contamination Levels: High levels of pesticide contamination have been detected in neotropical rivers, including substances that are banned in other countries due to their harmful effects. This contamination results from runoff from agricultural lands, where pesticides are heavily used.
Negative Example: The La Bonanza Banana Plantation near the Matina River is an example of severe pesticide contamination. The plantation’s runoff has been identified as a major source of pesticide pollution in the river. Residues of banned pesticides, such as chlorothalonil and mancozeb, have been found at dangerously high levels, affecting both the river’s ecosystem and local communities.
Positive Example: In contrast, the Agroforestry River Protection Project in the Osa Peninsula illustrates successful efforts to manage pesticide impact. This project promotes the use of integrated pest management (IPM) practices, which include reducing pesticide use and employing natural pest control methods. The project also supports buffer zones along riverbanks to minimize pesticide runoff, helping to maintain the health of local waterways.
Fish Populations: Elevated pesticide levels in these rivers disrupt aquatic ecosystems by affecting fish populations. High pesticide concentrations can be toxic to fish and other aquatic organisms, leading to reduced biodiversity and altered food webs.
Negative Example: The Río Pacuare Contamination Incident highlights the detrimental impact of pesticide use on fish populations. An investigation revealed that pesticide runoff from nearby agricultural fields caused fish kills in the Río Pacuare, leading to a significant decline in fish species and disrupting the local aquatic ecosystem.
Positive Example: The Fish Recovery Program implemented in the Río Savegre aims to counteract the effects of pesticide pollution. This program includes fish stocking, habitat restoration, and monitoring of pesticide levels to support the recovery of fish populations and enhance the river’s ecological health.
Human Health: Communities that depend on these rivers for drinking water and irrigation are exposed to health risks due to pesticide contamination. Long-term exposure to pesticides can lead to various health problems, including respiratory issues and neurological disorders.
Negative Example: In the Matina County Health Crisis, elevated levels of pesticides in drinking water have been linked to a rise in health problems among residents, including skin conditions and respiratory issues. The contamination has led to increased reliance on bottled water and healthcare services.
Positive Example: The Clean Water Initiative in the region has focused on providing alternative, safe water sources to affected communities. By offering access to clean water through filtration systems and improving water infrastructure, this initiative aims to reduce health risks associated with pesticide contamination.
Ecological Disruptions: The long-term impacts of pesticide pollution include disruptions in food webs and declines in sensitive species. The contamination affects the entire river ecosystem, leading to reduced biodiversity and altered ecological processes.
Negative Example: The Ecosystem Collapse in the Río Tempisque has been attributed to high pesticide levels, which have caused significant declines in sensitive species and altered food web dynamics. The river’s once-abundant biodiversity has been severely impacted, demonstrating the far-reaching effects of pesticide pollution.
Positive Example: The Ecosystem Restoration Partnership in the Río Chirripó aims to address ecological disruptions by restoring affected habitats and implementing conservation measures. The partnership involves local communities, conservation organizations, and government agencies working together to rehabilitate the river’s ecosystem and support the recovery of native species.
Efforts to Mitigate Pesticide Pollution:
Residents in Costa Rica’s agricultural regions are grappling with severe water contamination issues due to increasing pesticide use. Chlorothalonil, a fungicide banned in Europe and recently restricted in Costa Rica, has been detected in local springs, highlighting the problem. The contamination has resulted in various adverse effects:
Unsafe Drinking Water:
Negative Example: The San Carlos Region Contamination Incident involved high levels of chlorothalonil residues detected in the local water supply. Residents faced serious health risks due to unsafe tap water, leading to increased reliance on water deliveries. The contamination resulted in widespread public health concerns, with local clinics reporting higher rates of waterborne illnesses and related health issues. Efforts to address the problem included temporary water rationing and emergency water distribution, but the issue remained a significant challenge for the community.
Positive Example: In contrast, the Talamanca Safe Water Initiative has effectively tackled the issue of unsafe drinking water through the implementation of advanced water filtration systems. By partnering with environmental NGOs and local authorities, the initiative has provided affected communities with access to clean, safe drinking water. This proactive approach has improved public health and reduced reliance on potentially contaminated water sources.
Ongoing Pollution Challenges:
Negative Example: The Río Matina Pollution Crisis highlights the persistence of pollution challenges despite regulatory measures. Chlorothalonil residues continue to be found in the river, affecting both water quality and local agriculture. Despite the ban, illegal pesticide use and inadequate enforcement have allowed ongoing contamination, leading to persistent pollution problems. The local government’s efforts to address the issue have been hampered by enforcement challenges and limited resources, leaving the community to deal with the consequences.
Positive Example: The Sustainable Agriculture and Water Protection Program in the Osa Peninsula showcases a successful approach to addressing ongoing pollution challenges. This program promotes sustainable agricultural practices, including reduced pesticide use and the adoption of integrated pest management (IPM). Additionally, it supports regular monitoring of water quality and collaborates with local farmers to implement best practices. As a result, the program has significantly reduced pesticide contamination in local water sources and improved overall environmental health in the region.
Recent shifts in economic priorities under Rodrigo Chaves’s government have led to reduced funding for environmental programs, increasing pressures from tourism and development. Key issues include:
Costa Rica’s extensive ocean territory, which is ten times larger than its continental land area, presents both opportunities and challenges for marine resource management and tourism. Here are examples highlighting the impact of these factors:
Marine Resource Management:
Negative Example: The Corcovado National Park Overfishing Issue serves as an example of mismanagement of marine resources. In recent years, reports have highlighted significant overfishing near Corcovado National Park, a critical marine and coastal ecosystem. Local fish stocks have been severely depleted due to unsustainable fishing practices, impacting both biodiversity and the livelihoods of local communities who depend on these resources. The lack of effective enforcement of fishing regulations and the high demand for seafood have compounded the problem, illustrating the urgent need for improved marine resource management strategies.
Positive Example: The Marine Protected Areas Expansion Initiative exemplifies effective sustainable marine resource management. In a landmark move in 2023, Costa Rica dramatically increased its marine protected areas, marking a bold step toward safeguarding crucial marine habitats.
Costa Rica announced a significant enhancement of its ocean protection efforts by expanding its protected marine area from 2.7% to over 30% of its territorial waters. This ambitious leap places the country nine years ahead of the global target to safeguard nearly a third of the world’s land and sea. The expanded Cocos Island National Park and its surrounding marine protected area now span over 5 million hectares (12.3 million acres), making it 26 times larger than its previous size. Additionally, the Bicentennial Marine Management Area will increase to over 100,000 square kilometers (38,600 square miles), roughly equivalent to the size of Iceland, marking an eleven-fold expansion.
This extensive expansion aims to enhance biodiversity, support the recovery of fish populations, and promote sustainable fishing practices. The establishment of these protected areas has already led to visible improvements in local marine ecosystems and better conditions for coastal communities. This initiative demonstrates Costa Rica’s commitment to balancing marine conservation with economic development, ensuring long-term sustainability for its marine resources.
Tourism Pressure:
Negative Example: The Manuel Antonio National Park Overcrowding Crisis exemplifies the negative impact of unchecked tourism. In recent years, Manuel Antonio National Park has faced severe overcrowding issues, with visitor numbers far exceeding the park’s capacity. This influx of tourists has led to significant environmental degradation, including soil erosion, habitat destruction, and pollution. Local wildlife has been adversely affected, and the natural beauty of the park has been compromised. Court orders to limit visitor numbers have been implemented to address these issues, reflecting the ongoing struggle to balance tourism income with environmental preservation.
Positive Example: The Sustainable Tourism Certification Program in Costa Rica represents a successful approach to managing tourism pressure. Launched by the Costa Rican Tourism Institute (ICT), this program encourages businesses to adopt sustainable practices and limit their environmental impact. For example, the Nauyaca Waterfalls Eco-Lodge has received certification for its efforts to reduce waste, conserve water, and protect local wildlife. By adhering to sustainable tourism practices, the lodge helps minimize its impact on the environment while still providing a high-quality visitor experience. This certification program serves as a model for balancing tourism development with conservation efforts, promoting responsible tourism practices across the country.
Costa Rica’s ecotourism sector, a pioneer in Central America, faces scrutiny over the authenticity of its green claims. Key considerations include:
Genuine Practices: Many ecolodges adhere to true eco-friendly practices, including recycling, waste management, and the use of renewable energy. These practices not only minimize environmental impact but also contribute to local conservation efforts and support community well-being.
Positive Example 1: Lapa Rios Lodge, located in the Osa Peninsula, is renowned for its genuine commitment to sustainability. The lodge operates using solar energy, engages in extensive recycling programs, and supports local conservation projects. It also employs local staff and contributes to community development initiatives, making it a model of authentic ecotourism.
Positive Example 2: Rancho Margot, situated in the Arenal Volcano area, is another exemplary ecolodge. It runs a self-sustaining farm, uses hydroelectric power, and practices water recycling. Rancho Margot integrates sustainable agriculture with its tourism operations, and its efforts contribute significantly to the local ecosystem and community.
Positive Example 3: Finca Rosa Blanca Coffee Farm and Inn, located in the Central Valley, combines its ecotourism operations with sustainable coffee farming. The property uses organic farming practices, implements water-saving technologies, and supports local environmental conservation efforts. The inn’s commitment to sustainability extends to its eco-friendly building practices and community engagement.
Greenwashing Concerns: As demand grows, some hotels misrepresent their environmental practices, prioritizing profit over genuine sustainability. These establishments may use misleading marketing terms like “eco-friendly” or “green” without implementing substantial environmental measures.
All Hope is Not Lost
Despite the widespread challenges of greenwashing, environmental degradation, and the detrimental effects of pesticide use, hope persists in Costa Rica through the determined efforts of grassroots organizations, local communities, and individuals committed to genuine sustainability.
Rural small organizations in Costa Rica are leading the charge against environmental injustice. These groups, often operating on limited resources, are making significant strides in promoting authentic eco-friendly practices and advocating for the protection of local ecosystems. Their work includes educating communities about sustainable agriculture, monitoring environmental impacts, and fighting against illegal practices that threaten their lands.
Teachers in these communities play a crucial role in this movement. By integrating environmental education into their curriculums, they empower young minds to become informed stewards of the environment. These educators foster a generation that values and understands the importance of true sustainability, creating a ripple effect that extends beyond the classroom and into the broader community.
Costa Ricans have a history of resisting environmental injustices, demonstrating resilience and ingenuity. For instance, the successful campaign against the construction of the El Diquís Dam on the Térraba River showcased the power of community activism. Local groups and indigenous communities, backed by environmental organizations, challenged the project on the grounds of its adverse impact on local ecosystems and cultural heritage. Their efforts led to the suspension of the dam’s construction, highlighting the significant impact of collective action in defending environmental and social justice.
Furthermore, Costa Rica’s rich tradition of environmental activism includes initiatives such as the establishment of conservation areas and the promotion of sustainable tourism practices. These efforts reflect the nation’s commitment to preserving its natural beauty and ensuring that economic development does not come at the expense of its environmental integrity. For example, the Costa Rica Wildlife Foundation plays a pivotal role in protecting wildlife and their habitats, supporting conservation projects, and promoting sustainable practices among local communities. Additionally, Grow Jungles is actively involved in reforestation and habitat restoration efforts, working to restore degraded landscapes and support local biodiversity through community engagement and sustainable practices.
In summary, while Costa Rica faces considerable challenges in its quest for genuine sustainability, the nation’s ongoing struggle against environmental injustices and greenwashing is marked by the dedication of local organizations, educators, and activists. Their perseverance and commitment to real environmental protection serve as a beacon of hope. As Costa Rica continues to navigate the complexities of balancing economic development with ecological preservation, the efforts of these individuals and groups remind us that positive change is not only possible but actively happening.
Other References
EN 
ES